The Art of Conviviality: Ivan Illich's Vision for a Life Beyond Modern Institutions

We live in a world where everything is designed to be convenient. Swipe, click, and everything you desire, from groceries to companionship materialises at your doorstep or in your inbox. Yet, in a reality saturated with so-called conveniences, how many of us actually feel liberated? Instead, we find ourselves perpetually distracted, tethered to screens, and increasingly isolated. Enter Ivan Illich, the iconoclastic philosopher who, decades ago, saw the writing on the wall and urged us to rethink the tools that shape our lives. In a world gone mad with technology, Illich's concept of conviviality offers a desperately needed antidote, as outlined in his influential book Tools for Conviviality.

But let’s be clear: conviviality isn’t just about being sociable or friendly, as the word might suggest. For Illich, conviviality refers to something far deeper and more transformative. It’s about reclaiming our autonomy, reviving our communities, and rethinking the systems that dictate our everyday lives. To understand Illich’s vision, we must first grapple with his critique of modern industrial society. To him, it wasn’t just about the excesses of capitalism or the evils of big corporations; it was about the very way in which our tools, institutions, and technologies have been designed to disempower us.

The Tyranny of Tools: When Technology Becomes the Master

In Tools for Conviviality, Illich argued that, beyond a certain point, technological advancements shift from serving human needs to dictating them. His argument was simple yet profound: tools and technologies, which begin as means to improve human life, eventually become ends in themselves. “The machine,” Illich wrote, “is primarily a tool that operates independently of the human being who sets it in motion.” In other words, we have allowed our creations to slip beyond our control, turning us from masters into servants.

Consider how social media, ostensibly a tool to connect people has morphed into a beast that shapes public opinion, fosters division, and even influences elections. Or think of how the relentless drive for efficiency has led to the gig economy, where every minute of your day can be optimised for productivity, but where the worker is more fragmented and precarious than ever. Illich saw this coming, cautioning that “industrialised society has become a tool of social control,” reducing human beings to mere cogs in the machinery of ‘progress’.

Illich’s critique extends beyond gadgets to the entire apparatus of modern institutions. Hospitals, schools, and governments, he argued, have grown so complex and self-serving that they perpetuate the very problems they were designed to solve. “The current search for new institutions,” he noted, “only reinforces the dominance of those already in existence.” If that sounds far-fetched, just consider the NHS, where the bureaucracy seems to grow faster than the capacity to deliver actual healthcare. Or the education system, which churns out graduates loaded with debt and barely prepared for real-world challenges.

Conviviality: A Return to Human-Scaled Tools

In Tools for Conviviality, Illich presents an alternative: a world where tools are designed to empower individuals and strengthen communities, rather than controlling them. Convivial tools are those that are simple, accessible, and, crucially, under the user’s control. They don’t demand specialists or bureaucrats to operate, nor do they alienate people from one another. Instead, they foster a sense of agency, cooperation, and genuine human connection. “A convivial society,” Illich argued, “is one where modern technologies serve politically interrelated individuals rather than managers.”

Take, for instance, the humble bicycle. It’s a perfect example of a convivial tool: accessible to almost everyone, it doesn’t require a vast infrastructure, and it empowers people to move around freely on their own terms. Contrast that with the car, which needs petrol stations, motorways, and garages, not to mention the massive corporations and governments that profit from the automotive industry. As Illich aptly put it, “The bicycle is an instrument that allows man to reach his destination with a minimal investment of capital and consumption of resources.”

Or consider the world of software. Open-source platforms like Linux embody Illich’s vision of conviviality: they are freely available, modifiable by anyone, and encourage collaboration rather than competition. In contrast, the monopolistic practices of tech giants like Microsoft or Google create closed systems that lock users into their ecosystems and extract data for profit.

The Loss of Agency in a World Obsessed with Convenience

In our pursuit of convenience, we’ve sacrificed something far more precious: our autonomy. We’ve become passive consumers in a world where everything is pre-packaged and pre-digested. We no longer know how to grow our own food, repair our own homes, or even entertain ourselves without a screen. Illich argued that this loss of agency is not just an unfortunate by-product of modern life, it’s a direct result of how our tools and institutions are designed. “The illusion that we can control technology,” he warned, “only blinds us to the extent to which technology controls us.”

The modern obsession with efficiency and convenience has turned us into dependants, reliant on systems that we neither understand nor control. From healthcare to education to our very means of communication, we’ve outsourced responsibility to experts and institutions, forgetting that we were once capable of solving these problems ourselves. Illich’s vision of conviviality is, at its heart, a call to reclaim that lost agency.

Wit, Wisdom, and the Cult of Efficiency

Illich’s ideas may sound quaint, even hopelessly idealistic, but they carry a biting critique of our present reality. For instance, he would likely find today’s obsession with “smart homes” laughable. Imagine telling Illich that we now have fridges that can order milk for us because we’re too busy scrolling Instagram to notice we’re out of groceries. He might have quipped, in his characteristically sardonic tone, that we’re creating a world where people are so smart that they’ve forgotten how to live.

But Illich wasn’t against technology per se; he was against the way it was being used to centralise power and diminish human freedom. He envisioned a world where technology was a tool to enhance our capabilities, not a master to whom we must all bow. “Tools,” he wrote, “must be fit for conviviality, to serve life and community, not the other way around.”

A Convivial Future: Is It Possible?

So, what would a convivial society look like in our hyper-connected, tech-addicted world? It’s not about rejecting technology altogether but about using it wisely and on our own terms. It’s about building communities where people are empowered to solve their own problems, rather than waiting for some distant institution or algorithm to do it for them. It’s about embracing tools that enhance our freedom, rather than diminish it.

This might mean supporting local food co-ops instead of relying on supermarket chains, or using open-source software rather than surrendering all our data to Big Tech. It could even mean something as simple as spending less time online and more time talking to our neighbours. After all, conviviality begins not with grand gestures but with small acts of connection and cooperation.

Conclusion: The Lasting Relevance of Illich’s Vision

Illich’s vision of conviviality is not just a quaint throwback to a simpler time. It’s a radical challenge to the way we live today, a reminder that we don’t have to be slaves to the systems and technologies that surround us. In a world where we’re constantly told that “there’s an app for that,” Illich dares us to imagine a life where we don’t need apps at all.

The challenge, of course, is to embrace conviviality in a way that’s practical and sustainable. It’s not about turning back the clock but about moving forward with intention and clarity. Because, as Illich would argue, the true measure of progress is not how much we have, but how well we live. So, maybe it’s time to step off the conveyor belt of modern life and embrace a little more conviviality, one small, meaningful step at a time.

I hope you are enjoying my Ivan Illich series, if you have the means why not considering supporting this work with a paid subscription.