Hyperreality: The Sea/Goldfish Bowl in Which We Swim
Simulacra and Simulation
We tend to assume that reality is obvious and self-evident, something happens, we experience it, and later, we might describe it or record it. For most of human history, that order was taken for granted.
Hyperreality is the term for when that order quietly reverses.
Hyperreality describes a condition in which representations no longer point to reality but often replace it. Images, narratives, statistics, headlines, profiles, and platforms come to matter more than the lived events they are meant to describe. Reality does not disappear, but what increasingly counts as “real” is what is visible, documented, curated, and circulated.
The term hyperreality is most closely associated with Jean Baudrillard, who argued that modern societies are dominated by simulacra: copies that no longer refer back to any original. In Simulacra and Simulation, he wrote that “the simulacrum is never that which conceals the truth – it is the truth which conceals that there is none.” His point was not that nothing exists, but that truth has been displaced by representation.
At least in Plato’s cave the images on the wall had something real behind them; in hyperreality, the images increasingly refer only to one another, untethered from any stubborn reality that might resist, correct, or ground them.
When documentation outranks experience
In a pre-hyperreal world, representation followed reality. A photograph came after an event. A story followed an experience. The real world retained the power to contradict its images.
Hyperreality begins when this relationship flips, and becomes inverted.
A couple of years ago, my wife and I went away for a weekend to Donegal (the second most beautiful county in Ireland) the following week, I mentioned this trip in passing to a man I know. His response was immediate: “No you weren’t.”
When I asked why he thought I hadn’t been drinking stout in Donegal, he explained that he had seen nothing about it on Facebook. There were no photos, no posts, no sign ins, no digital trace. Since it had not been documented online, the event itself was treated as doubtful. This is hyperreality in everyday form. Reality no longer confirms representation, representation confirms reality. What is not documented increasingly struggles to be believed.
Living inside a curated reality
This inversion now shapes daily life.
We encounter places through images before visiting them. We meet people through profiles before entering their presence. We experience events through headlines, commentary, and reaction before the ‘facts’ have settled. By the time the ‘reality’ of a thing arrives, it is already framed for us, wrapped up in nice little bitesize Hors d'oeuvres.
Tourism provides an obvious example of hyperreality. Many people judge a place not by what it is, but by how closely it matches the images they have already consumed of it. If reality fails to conform to the representation, disappointment then follows, you see the image has become the standard by which the real is measured.
The News
Hyperreality is especially visible in modern 24-hour news culture, and in the incessant podcast commentary that now attends it. Most people never encounter wars, disasters, or political decisions directly. What they encounter instead is a constant stream of commentary: expert panels, graphics, opinion threads, and moral scripts telling them how to feel about it, and which side to pick.
What circulates is not the event, but interpretations of the event.
This produces a peculiar condition: people feel intensely informed and emotionally activated, yet largely powerless. One crisis replaces another with no resolution and no memory. Reality does not conclude; it refreshes. As Jacques Ellul observed, beyond a certain point information no longer enlightens but paralyses. Hyperreality doesn’t really need censorship, because it depends on saturation to achieve its goals.
I believe in the importance of this work, I want to keep it free to read for everyone and away from paywalls, this means I rely on the generosity of those who support the work. I am just a normal 5/8 labouring man, who really appreciates your support, so if you haven’t already, please give a paid subscription some thought.
Politics as appearance
In a hyperreal culture, politics becomes spectacle.
Leaders are judged less by outcomes than by optics and spin, symbolic gestures replace structural change. What matters is not whether a policy works, but whether it signals the right values, uses the correct language, and produces the desired emotional response, aligning the whistle up with the intended dog. Politics is no longer (if it ever was) primarily about governing reality, but about managing perception. This helps explain why the exposure of corruption, incompetence, or outright lies so rarely has lasting effect. Revelation no longer disrupts the system because the revelation itself becomes ‘content’ for the show. It is framed, debated, reacted to, monetised, and then discarded like everything else, and thus a scandal does not punch a hole in the spectacle; rather it feeds it.
Outrage flares briefly, hashtags trend, panels convene, podcasts dissect, and then attention moves on. Yesterday’s scandal is eclipsed by today’s carefully selected headline, which is itself soon replaced. Nothing settles, nothing concludes. and consequences are perpetually deferred.
In such an environment, memory shortens, accountability dissolves, and politics takes on the rhythm of entertainment rather than deliberation, it has literally become “Hollywood for ugly people” . The circus continues, and citizens are left with the uneasy sense of having seen everything and changed nothing, their political memory reduced to something closer to that of a goldfish than am actual participant in a shared civic life.
The everyday reproduction of hyperreality
Hyperreality is not imposed only from above, it is reproduced daily in countless different ways.
Social media trains people to curate their lives as representations. Moments are selected, framed, filtered, and shared. Over time, people begin to experience life through the imagined gaze of others. The meal matters because it is photographed, the holiday matters because it is posted, and the opinion matters because it is reacted to. Gradually, behaviour adapts to suit the image. The representation becomes not a record of the self, but its public stand-in. Presence gives way to appearance, the real self risks becoming secondary to how it is displayed. The deeper implications of this inversion deserve attention in their own right. For now, it is enough to note that hyperreality does not only reshape how we see the world, it begins to reshape how we understand ourselves, the filtered, curated “Selfie” replaces, and is more important than the “self”.
In hyperreality, truth no longer confronts people as something stubborn and external. It appears as one narrative among many. Claims are judged not by correspondence with reality, but by whether they fit an accepted frame. This is why debates never conclude, fact-checking rarely convinces, and everyone feels gaslit.
Baudrillard captured this bleakly: “We live in a world where there is more and more information, and less and less meaning.”
Why I am sometimes slow to comment
Seeing this sea of Hyperreality, has made me reluctant to comment on every new controversy or outrage. It is not that I am indifferent to what is happening “right now”. People often ask me to comment on, or write about what is currently in the headlines, and sometimes I do. However, I have become more and more convinced, that there is more wisdom in waiting. Yes there are more clicks, subscriptions, and certainly material benefits to jumping on every story, giving your tuppence worth, stirring some controversy. And yes, in this paradigm no one really cares if you get things drastically wrong, as most folks memories are wiped by the next headline. But when you recognise that much speech/commentary now functions as performance within this hyperreal simulation. To comment is often to enter a pre-scripted role, signal alignment, and often add noise without consequence.
Silence, in this context, can be a refusal to perform, yes I have opinions on most headlines, however by airing them, am I just adding to the confusion? To the noise? To the polluted sea in which we swim?
Resisting the Hyperreal
For most of us there is no clean escape from hyperreality. It is not a platform one simply logs off from, but an environment in which we now live, and any promise of total withdrawal is usually just another performance within the same system.
Resistance, therefore, may not mean exit but reorientation.
It begins with restoring confidence in lived experience. What you have seen, done, and known in time and place matters, whether it is documented or not. Reality does not require validation by platforms to be real. To trust one’s own experience again is already to weaken the spell. It also requires a refusal of compulsory commentary, a hard one I know, but not every event demands a response, a position, or a ‘performance’. Much of what passes for engagement now, actually serves the circulation of the hyperreal, rather than the truth. Silence, in this context, is not apathy but discernment.
Hyperreality feeds on speed and intensity, it loosens its grip where life slows down. Walking, manual work, sustained attention, unmediated conversation, and reading oh reading! all recalibrate the senses. They remind us what life really feels like, when it is not optimised, framed, filtered or curated. Place and time matter here too, hyperreality flattens them, rendering everywhere interchangeable, and everything temporary. Returning to the same ground, the same paths, the same people, and the same rhythms restores weight to existence. Perhaps the most difficult resistance (certainly online) is choosing depth over visibility. Doing things that will never be seen by the masses, writing articles that will never go viral, or make you money. Caring without display, working without signalling, living, actually living, without documentation, without hyperreal images. Hyperreality depends on appearance, it weakens when our attention is withdrawn from the need to ‘appear’.
Hyperreality is the sea/goldfish bowl in which we swim, it cannot simply be wished away. But it does not have the final word, wherever reality is allowed to impose itself again, through bodies, limits, memory, place, and time the simulation falters.
Our task may not be (for some it may be) to escape this hyperreal world, but to live in it as though the real still matters, and to shine the spotlight of embodied reality onto the hyperreal screen before us.
If you enjoy or get something out of my work but can’t quite stretch to a full paid subscription each month, or if you just want to bless me with a one off gift, you can always throw a wee donation my way over on Buy Me a Coffee/beer. A big thanks to those who already have, it really does mean a lot and helps more than you’d think.



…and to add Artificial Intelligence to the mix in the days ahead. I have snow and ice to battle with my shovel now thankfully, keeping it real. I won’t post any photos either 😆.
To start with an anecdote, when I was a student in Cambridge in the mid 1980s, we found it both odd and funny that the large number of Japanese tourists visiting the town seemed to experience all of it through a viewfinder, accompanied by the sound of motor wind-on (showing my age). We thought it was weird. But what we didn’t even suspect was that it presaged the future. I also remember to the first time I saw someone in a restaurant photographing her meal and then posting it on social media. I was amazed. I think part of the attraction of hyperreality is like the attraction of junk food: it feels good and gives a quick rush at first, and then becomes very bad for you. Hyperreality is playing games with our brain reward system. Thinking about Brid’s Point, I believe experiences growing up are at least one of the reasons why some people find it easier to keep on top of hyperreality. In my own case, it’s age. The web was only just becoming a thing when I was in my very late 20s. I remember first having an email address when I became an academic, and at that time the only people I could email were other academics. But within only two years the commercial world embraced email, as did people more generally. But crucially, all my formative experiences were militantly analog, in real life, face-to-face, however you want to express it. Having that grounding makes coping with the digital world, and sometimes just ignoring the digital world, very much easier. Of course that sort of childhood education and growing up simply can’t be given now, when digital media are so ubiquitous. But making sure the young grow up today with plenty - a significant majority - of real interactions, friendships and interests must surely be a part of coping with hyperreality.